Advertisement Ad

Democracy Asia Magazine brings you trusted timely and thought-provoking stories from around the globe.

Quick Contact:

  • 07974960666
  • info@democracyasia.com
  • 35 Bow Road, London, England, E3 2AD
Get In Touch
Share on:

Who will win the AI ‘Cold War’ between the USA and China?

The rivalry between the United States and China for superiority in Artificial Intelligence, or AI, is so intense that it deserves to be regarded as a war, albeit a technological war, that has the potential to determine where global power lies in the second quarter of the twenty-first century.

6-minute read

The rivalry between the United States and China for superiority in Artificial Intelligence, or AI, is so intense that it deserves to be regarded as a war, albeit a technological war, that has the potential to determine where global power lies in the second quarter of the twenty-first century. It can be argued that the development of ever more sophisticated semiconductors or  ‘chips’ – measured in ‘nanometres’ – is more important in the present age than the building of more powerful warships. We asked techie Sham Banerji to explain.  

Knights versus Stones 

In his 2011 book On China, former US Secretary of State Henry  Kissinger used two board games to illustrate the differences between traditional Western and Chinese strategies. The Western mindset, he argued, is associated with Chess, a game of decisive moves, ‘royal capitulation’, and total victory. Conversely, China plays Wei Qi or Go, a game that begins with an empty board and involves the patient placement of stones to occupy territory and gradually surround the opponent, aiming for relative advantage. 

Today, this metaphor is defining the race for AI supremacy. The  US plays Chess with a singular focus on ‘checkmate’, which might be defined as the achievement of Artificial General Intelligence  (AGI). China is playing Go, a state-managed consolidation of new and legacy semiconductor nodes and widespread territorial diffusion of AI across industry and civic functions. Winning in AI  will depend on which scoreboard you follow. 

The performance gap 

In frontier AI models, the American companies OpenAI, Google  DeepMind, Anthropic and Meta lead on performance. Stanford’s  AI Index 2025 lists 40 notable AI models from the US versus fifteen from China. American private investment into AI reached  US$109.1bn in 2024, nearly 12 times that of China at US$9.3bn. 

However, by early 2026, the performance gap had narrowed.  China is winning on a different board: model efficiency. The 2025  ‘DeepSeek Moment’ proved that China could match frontier performance at a fraction of the cost. The US still leads on general benchmarks, but China dominates ‘math-per-dollar’ categories. If the race shifts from ‘the best model money can buy’ to the ‘best model you can deploy everywhere’, then China’s Go strategy is succeeding. Alibaba’s Qwen and DeepSeek now lead in worldwide  ‘open-source’ model downloads. On investment, OECD data shows that China’s investment in AI startups from 2012 to 2024 at  US$276bn was double that of the EU, UK, Canada, and Japan combined, second only to the US. 

Semiconductor supremacy 

The US maintains its upstream advantage through two critical chokepoints: Electronic Design Automation (EDA) software,  which is used to design chips; and Extreme Ultraviolet (EUV)  photolithography hardware, which is used to manufacture them.  America’s Synopsys, Cadence and Germany’s Siemens EDA  control nearly 75% of the EDA market, while ASML (of the  Netherlands) monopolises EUV. These are the ‘Knights’ the US  uses to curb China’s advance. 

China’s response has been both strategic and reciprocal. In May  2025, the US Commerce Department’s EDA embargo on trading chips with China was rescinded within weeks, which was seen as a concession to offset China’s threatened reciprocal steps on the export of rare-earth magnets critical for all semiconductor manufacturing. 

Strategically, China’s massive state-level ‘Made in China 2025’  programme, started over a decade ago, has fortified a core group of domestic companies, focusing on areas like analogue chips and mature manufacturing nodes (for the technical, that is 28 nm to  90 nm). This allows China to secure territory in AI-adjacent industries such as automotive, robotics, and power. According to the International Federation of Robotics, China installed nearly nine times as many industrial robots in 2024 as the US,  representing 54% of global deployments. In robotaxis, America’s  Waymo leads on driverless trips (450,000/week) while Baidu’s  Apollo Go strategy captures territory across 20 cities in China, along with international footprints in the UAE and Switzerland. 

With EUV unobtainable because of American embargoes, China has stockpiled older-generation Deep Ultraviolet (DUV)  equipment. In addition, China has been “sweating” legacy fabrication lines to their limits, while experimenting on photolithography with emerging indigenous solutions. 

The ultimate chokepoint 

Nvidia’s CEO, Jensen Huang, calls data centres "AI Factories"  though it may be more appropriate to regard them as AI  Refineries. These facilities do not just store and process data, they refine real-world text, images, and sensor data into inorganic intelligence on an industrial scale. They are the undisputed markers of AI supremacy, built on thousands of GPU chips  (Graphics Processing Units) and gigawatts of power. While Nvidia holds a near-monopoly in GPUs, Huawei’s Ascend 910C,  fabricated in China at SMIC using legacy tech and smart system integration, is closing the performance gap. As Huang told the  Financial Times in November 2025, in the AI race, China is now only “nanoseconds behind America”.

When it comes to power generation, China has the edge. While the US has been straining under the shift to renewables, China has been leading in solar, wind, and nuclear and has added the equivalent of the entire US power grid since 2011. This allows China to add data centre capacity faster than the US. 

The infrastructure of power 

‘Sovereign AI’ is the state-led integration of AI into military, civic,  and geopolitical spheres. How fast and how widely the US and  China deploy it will determine the final outcome. With its 2025 AI  Action Plan and the 2026 Department of War AI Strategy, the US  has pivoted to a ‘Wartime AI’ mindset. It prioritises speed of military deployment over bureaucratic caution and its goal is to achieve unquestioned AI dominance. Geopolitically, the US plans to export what it sees as the ‘American AI Technology Stack’ (or  ‘Freedom Stack’) to vetted partners. 

In contrast, the focus of China’s ‘AI Plus Directive’ is to achieve  70% penetration across state functions such as the judiciary,  policing, and healthcare systems. Its military aim is  ‘Intelligentised Warfare’ or zhìnénghuà zhànzhēng. As part of its  ‘Digital Silk Road’ initiative, a term coined by Xi Jinping, China positions itself as the AI partner of choice for the Global South,  offering a ‘turnkey AI’ package of cloud computing, 5G/6G  networks, and governance software. 

The silicon shield 

Alongside AI, another Cold War is raging in which the battle lines are territorial. China considers Taiwan a province to be reunified,  potentially by force, while the US sees it as a self-governing democracy that it must protect. Taiwan’s outsized strategic semiconductor value deters conflict by creating global interdependence, but its physical proximity to mainland China creates a geopolitical fault line.

Frontier models set the ceiling; efficiency sets the diffusion rate;  chips and power set the speed of scaling; sovereign AI sets geopolitical leverage. As the gloves come off, victory in AI will be determined by these "weapons of mass diffusion". The stakes could not be higher.

By Sham Banerji

He is a veteran of the semiconductor industry with over three decades working with Texas Instruments and Philips in the UK, USA, and India.

Related News

The Xi-Trump talks: was anything achieved?

By Sir Vince Cable June 2026

The talks between presidents Xi Jinping and Donald Trump were important and timely though the mood music was subdued. Expectations were low and were, if anything, underachieved with little more than a few gestures of commercial goodwill. Former British minister for Business, Skills and Innovation Vince Cable reports.

Bisinomics

June 2026

India Narendra Modi has advised Indians not to travel abroad for  holidays and weddings. He also asked people to work from home  and use public transport. India is the world’s third-largest importer of oil. It faces a  ballooning economic challenge because of the sharp increase in  energy prices and an uncomfortably low level of reserves caused  by reduced supplies from the Persian Gulf following the virtual  closure of the Strait of Hormuz. ‘We must curb our use of petrol and diesel,’ Modi said in a  speech. ‘In cities with metro lines, we should use the metro  wherever possible… We must also place a strong emphasis on  saving foreign exchange.’ As Indians braced themselves for a  further escalation in energy prices, Modi’s critics mocked him for  not practising what he was preaching by taking off on a  five-nation overseas trip. They said hands-on economic  management was the national priority. The Financial Times reported that India ‘imported $174 billion of  oil and gas last year, with two-thirds of natural gas and half of  crude oil imports [coming] from the Gulf’. India has returned to  sourcing oil from Russia – after obsequiously obeying orders  from United States President Donald Trump not to, before Mr  Trump partially waived sanctions in March. The Indian cabinet,  meanwhile, approved expanded gas production from coal on an  urgent basis. Shortage of cooking gas has disrupted homes and  debilitated hotel and restaurant businesses.  Commuters crowd public transport in India as rising fuel costs and supply disruptions intensify pressure on households and businesses. Photo: EPA The FT reported that ‘higher import prices have hurt the Indian  currency and knocked investor confidence’. It added that ‘the  rupee has been among Asia’s worst-performing currencies since  hostilities began in the Gulf… Economists are concerned over the  war’s impact on India’s balance of payments, already under  pressure from foreign investors selling Indian stocks at the fastest  pace on record… As the Gulf crisis drags on, economists are  revising down their estimates for growth in India.’ Kazakhstan In contrast, Kazakhstan has since the start of the Iran war  experienced an appreciation in its currency, the tenge. Oil-rich,  the country has benefitted from the steep upward revision in  crude prices, leading to the strengthening of the currency. This  trend is likely to continue until international trade in oil  stabilises. The oil sector accounts for over 40% of the Kazakh  government’s revenues. Kazakhstan, though, is dependent on electricity from Russia. It  aims to exit from dependence on Russian imports by 2027, the  Times of Central Asia reported, following a restatement of the  goal by the country’s deputy energy minister, Sungat  Yessimkhanov. Rising global crude prices have strengthened Kazakhstan’s energy sector, even as the country faces domestic electricity challenges. Photo: Kazakhstan government website It is likely to fulfil that objective only if homes remain heated and  industry avoids shortages during peak demand. Kazakhstan has  had a power deficit because of years of underinvestment, rising  demand, ageing thermal plants and uneven regional output,  according to the same newspaper.Uzbekistan Another Central Asian state, Uzbekistan, posted healthy activity  in its car industry, selling 121,601 vehicles between January and  April of this year, as per figures released by UzAvtosanoat and  reported by UZ Daily. UzAuto Motors, the largest automaker in Uzbekistan,  maintained its dominant position, selling 58,168 vehicles. The  company manufactures a wide range of models under various  brands, including American General Motors’ Chevrolet. Chinese  brands and Kia of South Korea are also noticeable in the  Uzbekistan market.  Indonesia The energy crunch has affected oil-producing Indonesia because  its demand outpaces its crude output, so it is planning to expand  its nuclear power capacity. Significantly, director-general Alexey  Likhachev of Russia’s state nuclear energy corporation Rosatom  was in Jakarta to meet the Indonesian president, Prabowo  Subianto, to discuss bilateral cooperation. Indonesia is exploring expanded nuclear energy  cooperation as Asian governments search for long-term energy security solutions. Photo: SouthEast Asian Gallery Bernama reported Likhachev as saying Rosatom was ready to  offer Indonesia ‘a comprehensive approach to developing its  national nuclear programme, including both large-scale nuclear  power projects and small modular reactors and floating power  units’. Malaysia In neighbouring Malaysia, economic growth for the first quarter  of the 2026 financial year was 5.4%, exceeding the prediction of  5.3%. The number had moderated from the 6.3% enlargement in  the previous quarter. The Star quoted the chief statistician of Bank Negara Malaysia,  Datuk Seri Mohd Uzir Mahidin, as saying ‘Malaysia’s economy  continued to expand in the first quarter of 2026, reflecting the  underlying resilience and stable growth conditions amid a  challenging global environment.’ The country continued to record a surplus in its current account  balance for the same period amounting to RM15.2 billion,  equivalent to 3% of gross domestic product (GDP). This was  significantly higher than RM2.7 billion in Q4 of 2025. Mahidin  said this was attributed to, as The Star put it, ‘sustained external  demand for Malaysia’s exports alongside improving services  sector performance’. Singapore In the Chandler Good Government Index, Singapore retained its  top position for a fourth consecutive year. The seven pillars of  evaluation are: leadership and foresight, robust laws and policies,  strong institutions, financial stewardship, attractive marketplace,  global influence and reputation and helping people rise.  Singapore was ranked first in all categories except robust laws  and policies and global influence and reputation.However, as Singapore Business spelled out, Singapore Airlines  (SIA) suffered a 57% year-on-year slump in net profit to $1.18  billion in the financial year ending 31 March last, because of its  shareholding in loss-making Air India. SIA suspended services to Dubai and Jeddah in February as a  result of the war in the Gulf and deferred the introduction of  flights to Riyadh until September 2026. The suspension of flights  to Dubai has been extended to 2 August. South Korea Samsung, South Korea’s giant electronics firm, faced a general  strike from 21 May. The strike threatened losses running into the  tens of trillions of won, not to mention semiconductor  production chaos and supply chain instability, Business Korea  reported. After the failure of labour-management negotiations,  Koo Yun-cheol, deputy prime minister and minister of economy  and finance, wrote on X: ‘We will continue supporting resolution  through principled negotiations under any circumstances.’ From aviation to semiconductor manufacturing, major  Asian corporations are facing mounting uncertainty from  supply chain and energy disruptions. Japan A group of lawmakers in Japan’s ruling Liberal Democratic Party  submitted a proposal to Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi to review  the country’s Companies Act, which would require shareholders  to own at least 30,000 shares in an enterprise to call extraordinary meetings or enter items on the agenda. At present,  a 10,000 shareholding is sufficient for the purpose. The Japan Times wrote the change ‘would bring the Japanese  market more in line with standards in other countries, where it is  normally more difficult for shareholders to directly participate in  governance’. It is expected this will ‘make Japan into a leading  financial centre’.

Bisinomics

May 2026

Post-war reconstruction is in the minds of Arab partners of the United States, who were collateral casualties in the hostilities between the US-Israel alliance and Iran. Indeed, Saudi Arabia, among others, pressed Washington to return to the negotiating table, as The Wall Street Journal revealed.

Big Tech’s seatbelt moment

By Sham Banerji May 2026

As lawsuits mount and governments move towards tougher safeguards, the question is no longer only what appears on the screen, but why the screen was built to behave that way in the first place. Sham Banerji reports that a new regulatory phase may be opening for social media and AI.

Subscribe and login

Unlock Your Daily Briefing

Get the latest headlines, exclusive reports, and important updates delivered directly to your inbox.