Advertisement Ad

Democracy Asia Magazine brings you trusted timely and thought-provoking stories from around the globe.

Quick Contact:

  • 07974960666
  • info@democracyasia.com
  • 35 Bow Road, London, England, E3 2AD
Get In Touch
Share on:

Who will win the AI ‘Cold War’ between the USA and China?

The rivalry between the United States and China for superiority in Artificial Intelligence, or AI, is so intense that it deserves to be regarded as a war, albeit a technological war, that has the potential to determine where global power lies in the second quarter of the twenty-first century.

6-minute read

The rivalry between the United States and China for superiority in Artificial Intelligence, or AI, is so intense that it deserves to be regarded as a war, albeit a technological war, that has the potential to determine where global power lies in the second quarter of the twenty-first century. It can be argued that the development of ever more sophisticated semiconductors or  ‘chips’ – measured in ‘nanometres’ – is more important in the present age than the building of more powerful warships. We asked techie Sham Banerji to explain.  

Knights versus Stones 

In his 2011 book On China, former US Secretary of State Henry  Kissinger used two board games to illustrate the differences between traditional Western and Chinese strategies. The Western mindset, he argued, is associated with Chess, a game of decisive moves, ‘royal capitulation’, and total victory. Conversely, China plays Wei Qi or Go, a game that begins with an empty board and involves the patient placement of stones to occupy territory and gradually surround the opponent, aiming for relative advantage. 

Today, this metaphor is defining the race for AI supremacy. The  US plays Chess with a singular focus on ‘checkmate’, which might be defined as the achievement of Artificial General Intelligence  (AGI). China is playing Go, a state-managed consolidation of new and legacy semiconductor nodes and widespread territorial diffusion of AI across industry and civic functions. Winning in AI  will depend on which scoreboard you follow. 

The performance gap 

In frontier AI models, the American companies OpenAI, Google  DeepMind, Anthropic and Meta lead on performance. Stanford’s  AI Index 2025 lists 40 notable AI models from the US versus fifteen from China. American private investment into AI reached  US$109.1bn in 2024, nearly 12 times that of China at US$9.3bn. 

However, by early 2026, the performance gap had narrowed.  China is winning on a different board: model efficiency. The 2025  ‘DeepSeek Moment’ proved that China could match frontier performance at a fraction of the cost. The US still leads on general benchmarks, but China dominates ‘math-per-dollar’ categories. If the race shifts from ‘the best model money can buy’ to the ‘best model you can deploy everywhere’, then China’s Go strategy is succeeding. Alibaba’s Qwen and DeepSeek now lead in worldwide  ‘open-source’ model downloads. On investment, OECD data shows that China’s investment in AI startups from 2012 to 2024 at  US$276bn was double that of the EU, UK, Canada, and Japan combined, second only to the US. 

Semiconductor supremacy 

The US maintains its upstream advantage through two critical chokepoints: Electronic Design Automation (EDA) software,  which is used to design chips; and Extreme Ultraviolet (EUV)  photolithography hardware, which is used to manufacture them.  America’s Synopsys, Cadence and Germany’s Siemens EDA  control nearly 75% of the EDA market, while ASML (of the  Netherlands) monopolises EUV. These are the ‘Knights’ the US  uses to curb China’s advance. 

China’s response has been both strategic and reciprocal. In May  2025, the US Commerce Department’s EDA embargo on trading chips with China was rescinded within weeks, which was seen as a concession to offset China’s threatened reciprocal steps on the export of rare-earth magnets critical for all semiconductor manufacturing. 

Strategically, China’s massive state-level ‘Made in China 2025’  programme, started over a decade ago, has fortified a core group of domestic companies, focusing on areas like analogue chips and mature manufacturing nodes (for the technical, that is 28 nm to  90 nm). This allows China to secure territory in AI-adjacent industries such as automotive, robotics, and power. According to the International Federation of Robotics, China installed nearly nine times as many industrial robots in 2024 as the US,  representing 54% of global deployments. In robotaxis, America’s  Waymo leads on driverless trips (450,000/week) while Baidu’s  Apollo Go strategy captures territory across 20 cities in China, along with international footprints in the UAE and Switzerland. 

With EUV unobtainable because of American embargoes, China has stockpiled older-generation Deep Ultraviolet (DUV)  equipment. In addition, China has been “sweating” legacy fabrication lines to their limits, while experimenting on photolithography with emerging indigenous solutions. 

The ultimate chokepoint 

Nvidia’s CEO, Jensen Huang, calls data centres "AI Factories"  though it may be more appropriate to regard them as AI  Refineries. These facilities do not just store and process data, they refine real-world text, images, and sensor data into inorganic intelligence on an industrial scale. They are the undisputed markers of AI supremacy, built on thousands of GPU chips  (Graphics Processing Units) and gigawatts of power. While Nvidia holds a near-monopoly in GPUs, Huawei’s Ascend 910C,  fabricated in China at SMIC using legacy tech and smart system integration, is closing the performance gap. As Huang told the  Financial Times in November 2025, in the AI race, China is now only “nanoseconds behind America”.

When it comes to power generation, China has the edge. While the US has been straining under the shift to renewables, China has been leading in solar, wind, and nuclear and has added the equivalent of the entire US power grid since 2011. This allows China to add data centre capacity faster than the US. 

The infrastructure of power 

‘Sovereign AI’ is the state-led integration of AI into military, civic,  and geopolitical spheres. How fast and how widely the US and  China deploy it will determine the final outcome. With its 2025 AI  Action Plan and the 2026 Department of War AI Strategy, the US  has pivoted to a ‘Wartime AI’ mindset. It prioritises speed of military deployment over bureaucratic caution and its goal is to achieve unquestioned AI dominance. Geopolitically, the US plans to export what it sees as the ‘American AI Technology Stack’ (or  ‘Freedom Stack’) to vetted partners. 

In contrast, the focus of China’s ‘AI Plus Directive’ is to achieve  70% penetration across state functions such as the judiciary,  policing, and healthcare systems. Its military aim is  ‘Intelligentised Warfare’ or zhìnénghuà zhànzhēng. As part of its  ‘Digital Silk Road’ initiative, a term coined by Xi Jinping, China positions itself as the AI partner of choice for the Global South,  offering a ‘turnkey AI’ package of cloud computing, 5G/6G  networks, and governance software. 

The silicon shield 

Alongside AI, another Cold War is raging in which the battle lines are territorial. China considers Taiwan a province to be reunified,  potentially by force, while the US sees it as a self-governing democracy that it must protect. Taiwan’s outsized strategic semiconductor value deters conflict by creating global interdependence, but its physical proximity to mainland China creates a geopolitical fault line.

Frontier models set the ceiling; efficiency sets the diffusion rate;  chips and power set the speed of scaling; sovereign AI sets geopolitical leverage. As the gloves come off, victory in AI will be determined by these "weapons of mass diffusion". The stakes could not be higher.

By Sham Banerji

He is a veteran of the semiconductor industry with over three decades working with Texas Instruments and Philips in the UK, USA, and India.

Related News

Data, democracy and the new art of war

By Sham Banerji July 2026

Data is becoming the nervous system of the modern state. AI can help democracies govern better and fight smarter, but it can also turn public service into surveillance, as Sham Banerji reports.

Bisinomics

July 2026

Semiconductors Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, which  dominates production of the world’s most advanced chips,  reported May revenue up nearly 30 percent year on year after  debuting its advanced A13 process technology earlier this year. After the volatility caused by the war in West Asia, Asian markets  have been recovering strongly in the tech and semiconductor  sectors. Stocks in Japan’s Nikkei and South Korea’s Kospi  bounced back, partly as hopes rose of a deal between the United  States and Iran over their armed conflict. Chipmakers like South  Korea’s Samsung were leading the comeback. The country’s stock  market is approaching developed-market status according to  MSCI (Morgan Stanley Capital International). To add to the buoyancy, chipmaker ChangXin Memory  Technologies of China received regulatory approval for a US$4.2  billion initial public offering (IPO). This reflected wider  international excitement over AI infrastructure. Japan Japan plans to send a delegation to Greenland this summer to  study the possibility of mining rare earths and other critical  minerals, as it seeks to reduce reliance on China. US President  Donald Trump had previously threatened to annex the vast  Arctic island. So, Tokyo’s move, announced on the eve of the G7  summit in Évian-les-Bains, France, was unlikely to please Trump. Rare-earth minerals have become strategically  important as countries seek secure supplies for  advanced manufacturing, clean energy technologies  and defence industries. Photo: Resources ReviewOn a positive note, Takaichi advanced discussions with British  Prime Minister Keir Starmer, on their countries’ plan to sign an  £18 billion UK-Japan climate-related investment deal as warnings  grew that a strong El Niño could disrupt weather patterns and  test the UK’s climate preparedness. They also talked about how  to finance the proposed Anglo-Japanese joint venture to  manufacture combat aircraft.  Strait of Hormuz impact Insurance Asia quoted Oliver Miloschewsky, head of shipping for  Asia at Aon Plc, as saying, ‘What has shifted is not demand itself,  but how risk is priced, managed and operationalised in  delivering that demand.’ This was in reference to insurance cover  for voyages through the Strait of Hormuz. This suggests,  notwithstanding a ceasefire, that insurers remain cautious and  high insurance costs may continue.  Commercial shipping passing through the Strait of  Hormuz, a vital energy corridor where geopolitical  tensions continue to influence insurance costs, trade flows and energy security. Photo: Reuters Asian currencies continued to face an onslaught because of  foreign investors preferring to lock in profits from historically  high returns from Asian equity and repatriate funds. Lipper  Alpha Insight reported that ‘rising risk aversion has triggered  significant foreign selling’. The publication said foreign  ownership of Indian equities was ‘the lowest in nearly 15 years’.  Nearly US$20 billion has been withdrawn in the first half of 2026  from India. Amid the turmoil, the US has become India’s top gas  supplier after a force majeure freeze in exports from Qatar. China ‘China is innovative. Its economy is a mess. Which matters  more?’ The Economist asked, calling that ‘A question that will  define the 21st century’. This is a moot point, since China is the  world’s second biggest economy, Asia’s largest and a major engine  for Asian growth and prosperity. If Trump leaves the US economy in tatters a sensible successor  will likely start undoing the damage and the US will definitely  rebound. If China, despite totalitarian stability, is struggling  economically, then Asia – indeed the world – will need other  props.‘Since 2021 Chinese president Xi Jinping has steered China’s  economy away from a preoccupation with property (building it,  selling it and finishing it) towards high-tech manufacturing and  ‘new productive forces’, as the paramount leader calls them. ‘But  are the new forces big enough to fill the gap left by the old?,’ The  Economist asked, answering ‘Probably not big enough to offset  the drag from the old.’ India In 2010, when Manmohan Singh was India’s prime minister and  India was still widely discussed as a rising economic power, TIME magazine carried a debate on India and China’s economic  prospects. The cover said, ‘INDIA vs CHINA’, and posed the  question: ‘Which Economy Will Rule The World?’ and pictured  an elephant (representing India) and a dragon (signifying China)  locked in a tussle. Within the magazine, some experts bet on  India surpassing China this century. Today, such a suggestion would be treated as a joke. However,  resolution of the rivalry between these two economic powers  could lie in the potency of the combined strength of Asia’s ‘tiger’  economies, Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan.  East Asia South Korea’s president, Lee Jae Myung, appears to have steadied  his nation from the turbulence caused by his predecessor, Yoon  Suk Yeol, who declared martial law in 2024 before being  impeached last year. Referring to the upheaval in an interview  with The Economist, Mr Lee declared that his country could  ‘move beyond this normalisation of the abnormal’. The magazine  warned that ‘challenges loom’. Japan’s JERA signed a 20-year liquefied natural gas supply deal  with Malaysia’s Petronas. The shock of shutdowns in supplies  from the Gulf prompted Japan to diversify its purchases.  Malaysia was seen as a trustworthy ally. Analysts said Kuala  Lumpur is leveraging its natural resources to rise as a ‘middle  power’. Central Asia is attracting growing international  interest as investors look to the region's mineral  resources, transport links and expanding role in global supply chains. Central Asia Bucking adversity elsewhere, Central Asian economies promise a  strong 5.2 per cent growth projection. The Times of Central Asia reported that US investors are showing interest in Kazakhstan’s  critical mineral riches, focusing on both extraction and  processing. The paper also reported that Kyrgyzstan and Georgia  are exploring ways to connect their transport plans to the  China-Kyrgyzstan-Uzbekistan railway, with Bishkek seeking  access to Georgia’s Black Sea ports.

The Xi-Trump talks: was anything achieved?

By Sir Vince Cable June 2026

The talks between presidents Xi Jinping and Donald Trump were important and timely though the mood music was subdued. Expectations were low and were, if anything, underachieved with little more than a few gestures of commercial goodwill. Former British minister for Business, Skills and Innovation Vince Cable reports.

Bisinomics

June 2026

India is the world’s third-largest importer of oil. It faces a ballooning economic challenge because of the sharp increase in energy prices and an uncomfortably low level of reserves caused by reduced supplies from the Persian Gulf following the virtual closure of the Strait of Hormuz.

Subscribe and login

Unlock Your Daily Briefing

Get the latest headlines, exclusive reports, and important updates delivered directly to your inbox.