ADVERTISEMENT

Democracy Asia Magazine brings you trusted timely and thought-provoking stories from around the globe.

Quick Contact:

  • 07974960666
  • info@democracyasia.com
  • 35 Bow Road, London, England, E3 2AD
Get In Touch
Share on:

The Elements of Power — or Magnet Wars

Rare-earths appear to be a mining story. In reality, seventeen obscure elements in the periodic table, known as rare-earths, sit at the centre of global industrial rivalry. Technologies ranging from electric vehicles and wind turbines to fighter jets and semiconductor lithography machines are critically dependent on them, as Sham Banerji reports.

6-minute read

At the 2025 G7 summit in Canada, Ursula von der Leyen,  President of the European Commission, held up a rare-earth  magnet made in Estonia by a Canadian company using Australian  raw materials. The gesture not only captured Europe’s push to  build new supply chains, but also illustrated how the rare-earth  debate has shrunk to the size of a magnet. 

China’s strategic leverage lies in the factories that turn  neodymium (Nd) into powerful permanent magnets. Other  important uses of rare-earth elements or REEs include as  catalysts, ceramics and glass, metallurgical alloys, batteries and  polishing materials. According to the US Geological Survey, China  supplies over 90% of the world’s processed rare-earths and  rare-earth magnets, making them the main chokepoint in trade  negotiations. A single F-35 fighter jet contains more than 400  kilograms of rare-earth materials, mostly in permanent-magnet  systems such as radar and actuators. It is really a story about  magnets. 

The attraction of magnets 

Ordinary iron magnets are useful, but far too weak and unstable.  Precision manufacturing for advanced technologies requires  magnets that are small, powerful and able to work reliably at  temperatures of 150–200°C. That requirement is met by Nd–Fe–B  magnets. Made from neodymium, iron and boron, they are the  strongest permanent magnets known, making them vital for the  green economy and advanced defence systems. 

They are also critical in semiconductor manufacturing. An  extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography machine relies on powerful  magnets to drive precision linear motors and magnetically  levitated platforms that position silicon wafers with precise  nanometre accuracy. 

In practice, the geopolitics of rare-earths revolves around just  four elements: neodymium, praseodymium, dysprosium and  terbium. The International Energy Agency (IEA) tracks these four  elements separately because they are the ones most critical for  manufacturing NdFeB magnets. Magnets weighing only a few  hundred grams can determine whether industries worth billions  continue to function. 

Mother Lode 

Bayan Obo in China is widely regarded as the largest rare earth  deposit and production site in the world. While China holds  roughly half of global rare-earth reserves, its real power lies  further down the supply chain. China dominates rare-earth  processing accounting for about 85–90% of global refining  capacity. Even if they are mined elsewhere, rare-earths often need  to be sent to China for the specialised chemical processes  required to make them usable.
Bayan Obo Rare Earth Mines in Inner Mongolia Photo: NASA Earth Observatory 

America has not always trailed China in rare-earths. From 1965 to  the mid-1980s, Mountain Pass mine in California was the  dominant global supplier and the US was largely self-sufficient in  rare-earth elements. China overtook the US in rare-earth  production in the early 1990s. This was the result of decades of  strategic planning, relaxed environmental regulations and a focus  on the more complex downstream steps of separation, refining  and magnet-making. 

China wielded its rare-earth leverage as early as 2010. It cut export  quotas by 40% and briefly halted shipments to Japan during a  territorial dispute. It had to back down in 2015 after losing the  WTO case brought by the US, the EU and Japan. The net impact  was a collapse in prices that crippled other producers, causing  some like America’s Molycorp to go bankrupt. 

Land Mines 

Amid escalating U.S. technology sanctions and tariffs, China’s  Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) introduced new  export-control rules in October 2025. Certain foreign-made  products containing even 0.1% Chinese-origin controlled  rare-earth content by value could require a Chinese licence.  Potentially, this grants China extraterritorial control over global  supply chains. The Economist notes that China’s grip on  rare-earths is not primarily geological or technological; it rests on  the sheer scale and efficiency of its industrial ecosystem. But it  warns that ‘Xi Jinping’s weaponisation of rare-earth elements will  ultimately backfire. Here’s why.

Washington is aggressively rebuilding its position. With a direct  $400 million investment in MP Materials, the Department of  Defence is on a path to reviving Mountain Pass as the largest  rare-earth mining operation outside China. In February 2026, MP  Materials announced Northlake, Texas as its new 10X rare-earth  magnet manufacturing campus, backed by more than $1.25  billion in investment. The Pentagon's Department of War  specifically describes its rare-earth ambition as a ‘mine-to-magnet’ supply chain, stretching from extraction and  separation to magnet production. 

Between Beijing and Washington, the unresolved rare-earth  dispute remains stuck in a state of adversarial interdependence.  Magnets and chips are bound to rank high on the agenda when  the two presidents meet. 

The Global Dig — or Race to the Bottom 

The Financial Times reports that other rare-earth customers are  rushing to diversify away from Chinese suppliers, with more than  30 advanced projects expected to begin production globally  within the next five years across Europe, Africa and Australia.  Brazil’s Serra Verde has become a favoured rare earth hopeful,  securing a $565 million US financing package in 2026, complete  with an option for Washington to take a stake. 

India, meanwhile, is moving from rhetoric to state-backed  industrial policy. The Indian cabinet approved an $800 million  programme in 2025 to establish an integrated permanent-magnet  capacity, with production expected to begin by the end of 2026.  Japan marked its first import of rare-earths from Australia’s Lynas  in 2025, separated and refined in Malaysia.

Still, outside China, no single country possesses all the  ingredients needed to build a fully independent rare-earth supply  chain on an industrial scale. The emerging strategy is clear:  combine domestic investment with international partnerships,  linking mines, refineries and magnet plants with alliances. 

For now, the United States dominates the technology of  semiconductors. But China commands the chemistry of  rare-earths.

Some images in this article are AI generated 

By Sham Banerji

He is a veteran of the semiconductor industry having spent three decades working with Texas Instruments and Philips in the UK, USA and India.

Related News

Bisinomics

April 2026

The United States’ military operation in Venezuela, culminating in the abduction and rendition to New York of its president, Nicolas Maduro, is potentially an economic blow to China. Chinese credit to the South American country amounts to around US$10 billion. The South China Morning Post, quoting analysts, reported that Caracas could challenge the very legitimacy of the debts.

From beer baron to real baron – an interview with Lord Bilimoria

By Nicholas Nugent April 2026

India-born Karan Bilimoria, founder of Cobra Beer, has spent his career promoting links between Britain and India. A former chancellor of the University of Birmingham and now a member of Britain's House of Lords, he spoke to Nicholas Nugent about business, politics and the UK–India relationship.

The Asian Superpowers

By Sir Vince Cable March 2026

Are Asia’s superpowers setting the future global economic agenda? Vince Cable, a Liberal Democrat MP and UK Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills in the coalition government under David Cameron’s premiership, reports.

Who will win the AI ‘Cold War’ between the USA and China?

By Sham Banerji March 2026

The rivalry between the United States and China for superiority in Artificial Intelligence, or AI, is so intense that it deserves to be regarded as a war, albeit a technological war, that has the potential to determine where global power lies in the second quarter of the twenty-first century.

Subscribe and login

Unlock Your Daily Briefing

Get the latest headlines, exclusive reports, and important updates delivered directly to your inbox.